Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

Saint Kitts and Nevis
90 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Lucia
97.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
97th
Saint Lucia rank
94th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 97.5 DB16-20 methodology against 90 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 7.5 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th and Saint Lucia ranks 94th of 189 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 97.5 DB16-20 methodology against 90 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia?
7.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 97th and Saint Lucia ranks 94th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/st-kitts-and-nevis/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/st-kitts-and-nevis/st-lucia/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
189 places, 1,132 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.