Serbia vs Switzerland: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Serbia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 35 DB16-20 methodology against 27 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland, a difference of 8 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Switzerland's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 154th and Switzerland ranks 156th of 189 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Serbia or Switzerland?
- Serbia, at 35 DB16-20 methodology against 27 DB16-20 methodology in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Serbia and Switzerland?
- 8 DB16-20 methodology, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Switzerland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Serbia and Switzerland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Serbia ranks 154th and Switzerland ranks 156th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.