Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Samoa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 242 DB16-20 methodology against 230 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 12 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 40th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 188 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Samoa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 242 DB16-20 methodology against 230 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 12 DB16-20 methodology, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Uzbekistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Samoa ranks 40th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.