Papua New Guinea vs Peru: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Peru
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 85 DB16-20 methodology against 80 DB16-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 5 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 104th and Peru ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Papua New Guinea or Peru?
- Papua New Guinea, at 85 DB16-20 methodology against 80 DB16-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Papua New Guinea and Peru?
- 5 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Peru?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Peru rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 104th and Peru ranks 107th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.