Pakistan vs Tunisia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Pakistan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 144.44 DB16-20 methodology against 130 DB16-20 methodology in Pakistan, a difference of 14.44 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 188 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Pakistan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 144.44 DB16-20 methodology against 130 DB16-20 methodology in Pakistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Pakistan and Tunisia?
- 14.44 DB16-20 methodology, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Pakistan and Tunisia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Pakistan ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.