Oman vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Oman
- Rwanda
How they compare
Oman currently reports 124 DB16-20 methodology against 121.07 DB16-20 methodology in Rwanda, a difference of 2.93 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 73rd and Rwanda ranks 74th of 186 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Oman or Rwanda?
- Oman, at 124 DB16-20 methodology against 121.07 DB16-20 methodology in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Oman and Rwanda?
- 2.93 DB16-20 methodology, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Oman and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Oman ranks 73rd and Rwanda ranks 74th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.