Mongolia vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

Mongolia
82.56 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
85 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mongolia rank
106th
Papua New Guinea rank
104th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • Mongolia
  • Papua New Guinea
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 85 DB16-20 methodology against 82.56 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 2.44 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 106th and Papua New Guinea ranks 104th of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Mongolia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 85 DB16-20 methodology against 82.56 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Mongolia and Papua New Guinea?
2.44 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Papua New Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Mongolia ranks 106th and Papua New Guinea ranks 104th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/mongolia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/mongolia/papua-new-guinea/">Mongolia vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.