Libya vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Libya
- Malaysia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 60 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 128th and Malaysia ranks 128th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Libya or Malaysia?
- Libya, at 60 DB16-20 methodology against 60 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Libya and Malaysia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Libya ranks 128th and Malaysia ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.