Lebanon vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Lebanon
- Pakistan
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 135 DB16-20 methodology against 130 DB16-20 methodology in Pakistan, a difference of 5 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Pakistan ahead.
Lebanon ranks 68th and Pakistan ranks 70th of 189 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Lebanon or Pakistan?
- Lebanon, at 135 DB16-20 methodology against 130 DB16-20 methodology in Pakistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Lebanon and Pakistan?
- 5 DB16-20 methodology, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Pakistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Lebanon ranks 68th and Pakistan ranks 70th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.