Korea vs Norway: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Korea
- Norway
How they compare
Korea currently reports 26.75 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Norway, a difference of 26.75 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 156th and Norway ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Korea or Norway?
- Korea, at 26.75 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Korea and Norway?
- 26.75 DB16-20 methodology, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Korea and Norway rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Korea ranks 156th and Norway ranks 159th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.