Israel vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Israel
- Philippines
How they compare
Israel currently reports 70 DB16-20 methodology against 67.5 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 2.5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 120th and Philippines ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Israel or Philippines?
- Israel, at 70 DB16-20 methodology against 67.5 DB16-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Israel and Philippines?
- 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Israel ranks 120th and Philippines ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.