India vs Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- India
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 107 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in India, a difference of 7 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was India ahead.
India ranks 85th and Japan ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), India or Japan?
- Japan, at 107 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in India as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between India and Japan?
- 7 DB16-20 methodology, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do India and Japan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- India ranks 85th and Japan ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.