Haiti vs Russia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Haiti
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 152.5 DB16-20 methodology against 150 DB16-20 methodology in Haiti, a difference of 2.5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 62nd and Russia ranks 60th of 188 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Haiti or Russia?
- Russia, at 152.5 DB16-20 methodology against 150 DB16-20 methodology in Haiti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Haiti and Russia?
- 2.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Russia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Haiti and Russia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Haiti ranks 62nd and Russia ranks 60th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.