Guatemala vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Guatemala
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 40 DB16-20 methodology against 37 DB16-20 methodology in Guatemala, a difference of 3 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 149th of 188 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Guatemala or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 40 DB16-20 methodology against 37 DB16-20 methodology in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Guatemala and Suriname?
- 3 DB16-20 methodology, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Guatemala ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 149th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.