Ghana vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Ghana
- Sudan
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 474 DB16-20 methodology against 420 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 54 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 14th and Sudan ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Ghana or Sudan?
- Ghana, at 474 DB16-20 methodology against 420 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Ghana and Sudan?
- 54 DB16-20 methodology, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ghana and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Ghana ranks 14th and Sudan ranks 16th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.