Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 73 DB16-20 methodology against 70 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 120th and South Africa ranks 119th of 189 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Equatorial Guinea or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 73 DB16-20 methodology against 70 DB16-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Equatorial Guinea and South Africa?
- 3 DB16-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 120th and South Africa ranks 119th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.