Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Ecuador
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 75 DB16-20 methodology against 75 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 113th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 113th of 189 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Ecuador or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Ecuador, at 75 DB16-20 methodology against 75 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Ecuador ranks 113th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 113th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.