Croatia vs Malta: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Croatia
- Malta
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 159th and Malta ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Croatia or Malta?
- Croatia, at 0 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Croatia and Malta?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Malta rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Croatia ranks 159th and Malta ranks 159th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.