Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
765 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Egypt
1,000 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
5th
Egypt rank
2nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Egypt
02004006008001.0k201420162019

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1,000 DB16-20 methodology against 765 DB16-20 methodology in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 235 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.3 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 5th and Egypt ranks 2nd of 188 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Egypt?
Egypt, at 1,000 DB16-20 methodology against 765 DB16-20 methodology in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Egypt?
235 DB16-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Egypt?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Egypt rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 5th and Egypt ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/egypt-arab-rep/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.