China (People's Republic of) vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

China (People's Republic of)
77.25 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Eswatini
75.56 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China (People's Republic of) rank
111th
Eswatini rank
112th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • China (People's Republic of)
  • Eswatini
050100150201420162019

How they compare

China (People's Republic of) currently reports 77.25 DB16-20 methodology against 75.56 DB16-20 methodology in Eswatini, a difference of 1.69 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, China (People's Republic of) has been ahead every year.

China (People's Republic of) ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 112th of 188 countries.

China (People's Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), China (People's Republic of) or Eswatini?
China (People's Republic of), at 77.25 DB16-20 methodology against 75.56 DB16-20 methodology in Eswatini as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between China (People's Republic of) and Eswatini?
1.69 DB16-20 methodology, with China (People's Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People's Republic of) and Eswatini?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do China (People's Republic of) and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
China (People's Republic of) ranks 111th and Eswatini ranks 112th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People's Republic of) vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/china/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/china/eswatini/">China (People's Republic of) vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.