Chile vs Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Chile currently reports 50 DB16-20 methodology against 50 DB16-20 methodology in Panama, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 135th and Panama ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Chile or Panama?
- Chile, at 50 DB16-20 methodology against 50 DB16-20 methodology in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Chile and Panama?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Chile ranks 135th and Panama ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.