Cambodia vs Oman: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Cambodia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 124 DB16-20 methodology against 120 DB16-20 methodology in Cambodia, a difference of 4 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 75th and Oman ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Cambodia or Oman?
- Oman, at 124 DB16-20 methodology against 120 DB16-20 methodology in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Cambodia and Oman?
- 4 DB16-20 methodology, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Oman?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Oman rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Cambodia ranks 75th and Oman ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.