Burkina Faso vs Georgia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Georgia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 196.5 DB16-20 methodology against 189 DB16-20 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 7.5 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 46th and Georgia ranks 48th of 189 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Burkina Faso or Georgia?
- Burkina Faso, at 196.5 DB16-20 methodology against 189 DB16-20 methodology in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Burkina Faso and Georgia?
- 7.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Georgia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Georgia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 46th and Georgia ranks 48th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.