Bolivia vs Guatemala: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Bolivia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 37 DB16-20 methodology against 30 DB16-20 methodology in Bolivia, a difference of 7 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Bolivia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 154th and Guatemala ranks 152nd of 188 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Bolivia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 37 DB16-20 methodology against 30 DB16-20 methodology in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Bolivia and Guatemala?
- 7 DB16-20 methodology, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Guatemala?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Guatemala rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Bolivia ranks 154th and Guatemala ranks 152nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.