Benin vs United States: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Benin
- United States
How they compare
Benin currently reports 110 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in United States, a difference of 10 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times United States's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 82nd and United States ranks 85th of 188 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Benin or United States?
- Benin, at 110 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Benin and United States?
- 10 DB16-20 methodology, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and United States?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Benin and United States rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Benin ranks 82nd and United States ranks 85th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.