Belize vs China: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Belize
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 77.25 DB16-20 methodology against 75 DB16-20 methodology in Belize, a difference of 2.25 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 113th and China ranks 111th of 189 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Belize or China?
- China, at 77.25 DB16-20 methodology against 75 DB16-20 methodology in Belize as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Belize and China?
- 2.25 DB16-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belize and China rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Belize ranks 113th and China ranks 111th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.