Bahamas, The vs Chad: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Bahamas, The
- Chad
How they compare
Bahamas, The currently reports 550 DB16-20 methodology against 500 DB16-20 methodology in Chad, a difference of 50 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Bahamas, The's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bahamas, The has been ahead every year.
Bahamas, The ranks 9th and Chad ranks 11th of 188 countries.
Bahamas, The has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Bahamas, The or Chad?
- Bahamas, The, at 550 DB16-20 methodology against 500 DB16-20 methodology in Chad as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Bahamas, The and Chad?
- 50 DB16-20 methodology, with Bahamas, The ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas, The and Chad?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas, The and Chad rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Bahamas, The ranks 9th and Chad ranks 11th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.