Australia vs Benin: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Australia
- Benin
How they compare
Benin currently reports 110 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in Australia, a difference of 10 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 85th and Benin ranks 82nd of 186 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Australia or Benin?
- Benin, at 110 DB16-20 methodology against 100 DB16-20 methodology in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Australia and Benin?
- 10 DB16-20 methodology, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Benin?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Benin rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Australia ranks 85th and Benin ranks 82nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.