Albania vs Korea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Albania
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 26.75 DB16-20 methodology against 10 DB16-20 methodology in Albania, a difference of 16.75 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Korea's figure about 2.7 times Albania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 158th and Korea ranks 156th of 188 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Albania or Korea?
- Korea, at 26.75 DB16-20 methodology against 10 DB16-20 methodology in Albania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Albania and Korea?
- 16.75 DB16-20 methodology, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Albania and Korea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Albania ranks 158th and Korea ranks 156th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.