Afghanistan vs Egypt: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Afghanistan
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1,000 DB16-20 methodology against 900 DB16-20 methodology in Afghanistan, a difference of 100 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Egypt ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Afghanistan or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 1,000 DB16-20 methodology against 900 DB16-20 methodology in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Afghanistan and Egypt?
- 100 DB16-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Egypt?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Egypt rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Egypt ranks 2nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.