Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Cameroon: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
900 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cameroon
849 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
3rd
Cameroon rank
4th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

  • Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
  • Cameroon
02004006008001.0k201420162019

How they compare

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 900 DB16-20 methodology against 849 DB16-20 methodology in Cameroon, a difference of 51 DB16-20 methodology.

That makes Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 3rd and Cameroon ranks 4th of 188 countries.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Cameroon?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 900 DB16-20 methodology against 849 DB16-20 methodology in Cameroon as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Cameroon?
51 DB16-20 methodology, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Cameroon?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Cameroon rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 3rd and Cameroon ranks 4th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Cameroon: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/afghanistan/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology/afghanistan/cameroon/">Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Cameroon: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 1,126 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.