Afghanistan vs Burundi: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Afghanistan
- Burundi
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 1,025 DB16-20 methodology against 900 DB16-20 methodology in Afghanistan, a difference of 125 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Burundi ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Afghanistan or Burundi?
- Burundi, at 1,025 DB16-20 methodology against 900 DB16-20 methodology in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Afghanistan and Burundi?
- 125 DB16-20 methodology, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Burundi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Burundi rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Afghanistan ranks 3rd and Burundi ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost for documentary compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for documentary compliance includes the cost for obtaining, preparing, processing, presenting and submitting documents. Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.