Sao Tome and Principe vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Sao Tome and Principe
89.29
in 2019
South Africa
89.57
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
72nd
South Africa rank
71st
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 89.57 against 89.29 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.28.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 71st of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Sao Tome and Principe or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 89.57 against 89.29 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Sao Tome and Principe and South Africa?
- 0.28, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.