Papua New Guinea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Papua New Guinea
87.86
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
87.14
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
85th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
88th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 87.86 against 87.14 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.72.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 85th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Papua New Guinea or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Papua New Guinea, at 87.86 against 87.14 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Papua New Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.72, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 85th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.