Niger vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Niger
59.71
in 2019
Uruguay
59.29
in 2019
Niger rank
154th
Uruguay rank
157th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Niger
  • Uruguay
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Niger currently reports 59.71 against 59.29 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.42.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Uruguay ahead.

Niger ranks 154th and Uruguay ranks 157th of 188 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (, Niger or Uruguay?
Niger, at 59.71 against 59.29 in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Niger and Uruguay?
0.42, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Uruguay?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Niger and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Niger ranks 154th and Uruguay ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.