Nicaragua vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Nicaragua
87.7
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
87.14
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
87th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
88th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Nicaragua
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 87.7 against 87.14 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.56.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 87th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Nicaragua or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Nicaragua, at 87.7 against 87.14 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Nicaragua and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.56, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Nicaragua ranks 87th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.