Mongolia vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Mongolia
88.21
in 2019
Palestine, State of
87.86
in 2019
Mongolia rank
84th
Palestine, State of rank
85th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Mongolia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 88.21 against 87.86 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.35.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 84th and Palestine, State of ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Mongolia or Palestine, State of?
- Mongolia, at 88.21 against 87.86 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Mongolia and Palestine, State of?
- 0.35, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Mongolia ranks 84th and Palestine, State of ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.