Malta vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Malta
100
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
100
in 2019
Malta rank
1st
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
1st
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Malta
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Malta currently reports 100 against 100 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 1st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Malta or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Malta, at 100 against 100 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Malta and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malta and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Malta ranks 1st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.