Mali vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Mali
87.14
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
87.86
in 2019
Mali rank
88th
Papua New Guinea rank
85th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Mali
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 87.86 against 87.14 in Mali, a difference of 0.72.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Mali or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 87.86 against 87.14 in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Mali and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.72, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mali and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Mali ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.