Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Marshall Islands: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
93.97
in 2019
Marshall Islands
93.93
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
42nd
Marshall Islands rank
44th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 93.97 against 93.93 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.04.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 42nd and Marshall Islands ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Marshall Islands?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 93.97 against 93.93 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Marshall Islands?
- 0.04, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Marshall Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Marshall Islands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 42nd and Marshall Islands ranks 44th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.