Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Nicaragua: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
87.14
in 2019
Nicaragua
87.7
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
88th
Nicaragua rank
87th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 87.7 against 87.14 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.56.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 88th and Nicaragua ranks 87th of 191 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 87.7 against 87.14 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Nicaragua?
- 0.56, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Nicaragua rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 88th and Nicaragua ranks 87th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.