Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
87.14
in 2019
Lesotho, Kingdom of
87.14
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
87th
Lesotho, Kingdom of rank
87th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Lesotho, Kingdom of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 87.14 against 87.14 in Lesotho, Kingdom of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lesotho, Kingdom of has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 87th and Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 87th of 190 countries.
Lesotho, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Lesotho, Kingdom of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 87.14 against 87.14 in Lesotho, Kingdom of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Lesotho, Kingdom of?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Lesotho, Kingdom of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Lesotho, Kingdom of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 87th and Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 87th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.