Guinea-Bissau vs Solomon Islands: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Guinea-Bissau
70.71
in 2019
Solomon Islands
69.29
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
147th
Solomon Islands rank
149th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 70.71 against 69.29 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 1.42.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th and Solomon Islands ranks 149th of 191 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Guinea-Bissau or Solomon Islands?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 70.71 against 69.29 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
- 1.42, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Solomon Islands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th and Solomon Islands ranks 149th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.