Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Philippines: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
90
in 2019
Philippines
90.36
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
67th
Philippines rank
66th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 90.36 against 90 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 0.36.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 67th and Philippines ranks 66th of 190 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 90.36 against 90 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Philippines?
- 0.36, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Philippines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Philippines rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 67th and Philippines ranks 66th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.