Equatorial Guinea vs Israel: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Equatorial Guinea
90
in 2019
Israel
90
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
67th
Israel rank
67th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Israel
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 90 against 90 in Israel, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th and Israel ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Equatorial Guinea or Israel?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 90 against 90 in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Equatorial Guinea and Israel?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Israel?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Israel rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th and Israel ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.