Dominican Republic vs Republic of Moldova: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Dominican Republic
94.29
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
94.13
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
38th
Republic of Moldova rank
41st
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 94.29 against 94.13 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.16.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 38th and Republic of Moldova ranks 41st of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Dominican Republic or Republic of Moldova?
- Dominican Republic, at 94.29 against 94.13 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Dominican Republic and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.16, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Republic of Moldova?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Republic of Moldova rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 38th and Republic of Moldova ranks 41st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.