Côte d'Ivoire vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Côte d'Ivoire
61.9
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
64.29
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
155th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
152nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 64.29 against 61.9 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 2.39.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 155th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Côte d'Ivoire or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 64.29 against 61.9 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Côte d'Ivoire and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2.39, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 155th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.