Congo vs South Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Congo
55.71
in 2019
South Sudan
50
in 2019
Congo rank
163rd
South Sudan rank
165th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Congo
- South Sudan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 55.71 against 50 in South Sudan, a difference of 5.71.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 163rd and South Sudan ranks 165th of 190 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Congo or South Sudan?
- Congo, at 55.71 against 50 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Congo and South Sudan?
- 5.71, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Congo and South Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Congo ranks 163rd and South Sudan ranks 165th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.