Comoros vs Mexico: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Comoros
86.74
in 2019
Mexico
85.71
in 2019
Comoros rank
93rd
Mexico rank
95th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Comoros
  • Mexico
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 86.74 against 85.71 in Mexico, a difference of 1.03.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 93rd and Mexico ranks 95th of 188 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (, Comoros or Mexico?
Comoros, at 86.74 against 85.71 in Mexico as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Comoros and Mexico?
1.03, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Mexico?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Mexico rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Comoros ranks 93rd and Mexico ranks 95th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.