What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini, Kingdom of?

0.25, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini, Kingdom of?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China (People’s Republic of) vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

China (People’s Republic of)

88.96

in 2019

Eswatini, Kingdom of

89.21

in 2019

China (People’s Republic of) rank

78th

Eswatini, Kingdom of rank

77th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

China (People’s Republic of)
Eswatini, Kingdom of

How they compare

Eswatini, Kingdom of currently reports 89.21 against 88.96 in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 0.25.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini, Kingdom of has been ahead every year.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 78th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 77th of 190 countries.

Eswatini, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), China (People’s Republic of) or Eswatini, Kingdom of?: Eswatini, Kingdom of, at 89.21 against 88.96 in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini, Kingdom of?: 0.25, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini, Kingdom of?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Eswatini, Kingdom of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?: China (People’s Republic of) ranks 78th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 77th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/china/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/china/eswatini/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.